Africa vs Eswatini: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Africa
2 t
in 2023
Eswatini
0 t
in 2023
Africa rank
5th
Eswatini rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Africa
- Eswatini
How they compare
Africa currently reports 2 t against 0 t in Eswatini, a difference of 2 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Africa ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 5th of 28 groups.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -25 t | -3.3 t | 21.7 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -16.25 t | 0 t | 16.25 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Africa or Eswatini?
- Africa, at 2 t against 0 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Africa and Eswatini?
- 2 t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Eswatini?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Eswatini rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Africa ranks 5th and Eswatini ranks 5th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.