Afghanistan vs Finland: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Afghanistan
1 t
in 2023
Finland
0 t
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
3rd
Finland rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Afghanistan
- Finland
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Finland, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Finland ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Finland ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -10.67 t | -14.67 t | 4 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 3.25 t | 0 t | 3.25 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Afghanistan or Finland?
- Afghanistan, at 1 t against 0 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Afghanistan and Finland?
- 1 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Finland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Finland rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Finland ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.