China, Macao SAR vs Congo: Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed

China, Macao SAR
0.01 t
in 2018
Congo
2,249 t
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
29th
Congo rank
26th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Congo
01.0k2.0k3.0k201020162023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2,249 t against 0.01 t in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 2,249 t.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 29th and Congo ranks 26th of 35 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — processed, China, Macao SAR or Congo?
Congo, at 2,249 t against 0.01 t in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — processed between China, Macao SAR and Congo?
2,249 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Congo?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do China, Macao SAR and Congo rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — processed?
China, Macao SAR ranks 29th and Congo ranks 26th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 689 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.