China, Hong Kong SAR vs Costa Rica: Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2023
Costa Rica
2.4 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
24th
Costa Rica rank
22nd
Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 2.4 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 2.4 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 24th and Costa Rica ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.02 t | 60.8 t | 15.23 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0.875 t | 0.875 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — processed, China, Hong Kong SAR or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 2.4 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — processed between China, Hong Kong SAR and Costa Rica?
- 2.4 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Costa Rica?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Costa Rica rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — processed?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 24th and Costa Rica ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Processed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.