Romania vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Romania
30.74 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
23 t
in 2023
Romania rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Romania currently reports 30.74 t against 23 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 7.74 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Romania ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 102.74 t | 46.52 t | 56.22 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 34.12 t | 38.72 t | 4.6 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Romania, at 30.74 t against 23 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 7.74 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Romania ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.