Panama vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Panama
19.73 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
23 t
in 2023
Panama rank
68th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Panama
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 23 t against 19.73 t in Panama, a difference of 3.27 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.26 t | 57.37 t | 45.11 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 16.25 t | 33.82 t | 17.57 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Panama or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 23 t against 19.73 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 3.27 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Panama ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.