Lebanon vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Lebanon
14.82 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
23 t
in 2023
Lebanon rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Lebanon
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 23 t against 14.82 t in Lebanon, a difference of 8.18 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Lebanon ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.64 t | 51.77 t | 36.13 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 5.48 t | 38.72 t | 33.24 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Lebanon or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 23 t against 14.82 t in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Lebanon and Zimbabwe?
- 8.18 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Lebanon ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.