Lebanon vs Namibia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Lebanon
14.82 t
in 2023
Namibia
7.27 t
in 2023
Lebanon rank
70th
Namibia rank
73rd
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Lebanon
- Namibia
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 14.82 t against 7.27 t in Namibia, a difference of 7.55 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 2.0 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Namibia ahead.
Lebanon ranks 70th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.64 t | 25.43 t | 9.79 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 5.48 t | 3.83 t | 1.65 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Lebanon or Namibia?
- Lebanon, at 14.82 t against 7.27 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Lebanon and Namibia?
- 7.55 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Namibia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Lebanon ranks 70th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.