Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
3,730 t
in 2023
Russian Federation
3,221 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
19th
Russian Federation rank
17th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Russian Federation
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 3,730 t against 3,221 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 509 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 17th of 27 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2010s 1,535 t 4,658 t 3,123 t Russian Federation
2020s 4,704 t 6,108 t 1,404 t Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Russian Federation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 3,730 t against 3,221 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
509 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 17th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/russian-federation-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Russian Federation: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
151 places, 1,836 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.