Estonia vs Namibia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Estonia
4.19 t
in 2023
Namibia
7.27 t
in 2023
Estonia rank
76th
Namibia rank
73rd
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Estonia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 7.27 t against 4.19 t in Estonia, a difference of 3.08 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.7 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Estonia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.1 t | 23.27 t | 21.18 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3.01 t | 3.83 t | 0.815 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Estonia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 7.27 t against 4.19 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Estonia and Namibia?
- 3.08 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Namibia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Estonia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.