Botswana vs Malta: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Botswana
1.34 t
in 2023
Malta
3 t
in 2023
Botswana rank
87th
Malta rank
84th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Botswana
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 3 t against 1.34 t in Botswana, a difference of 1.66 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 87th and Malta ranks 84th of 110 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.76 t | 1.99 t | 40.77 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.805 t | 3.06 t | 2.25 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Botswana or Malta?
- Malta, at 3 t against 1.34 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Botswana and Malta?
- 1.66 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malta?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Malta rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Botswana ranks 87th and Malta ranks 84th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.