Botswana vs Ireland: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses
Botswana
1.34 t
in 2023
Ireland
2.63 t
in 2023
Botswana rank
87th
Ireland rank
85th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time
- Botswana
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 2.63 t against 1.34 t in Botswana, a difference of 1.29 t.
That makes Ireland's figure about 2.0 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 87th and Ireland ranks 85th of 110 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.48 t | 197.67 t | 153.18 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0.7233 t | 32.01 t | 31.28 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Botswana or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 2.63 t against 1.34 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Botswana and Ireland?
- 1.29 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ireland?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Ireland rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?
- Botswana ranks 87th and Ireland ranks 85th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.