What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?

81.11 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?

14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses

Australia and New Zealand

351.22 t

in 2023

Chile

270.11 t

in 2023

Australia and New Zealand rank

34th

Chile rank

36th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses over time

Australia and New Zealand
Chile

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 351.22 t against 270.11 t in Chile, a difference of 81.11 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Chile ranks 36th of 110 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia and New Zealand	Chile	Difference	Ahead
2010s	850.7 t	387.29 t	463.41 t	Australia and New Zealand
2020s	447.29 t	359.16 t	88.14 t	Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — other uses, Australia and New Zealand or Chile?: Australia and New Zealand, at 351.22 t against 270.11 t in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — other uses between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?: 81.11 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Chile rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — other uses?: Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Chile ranks 36th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/">Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Natural rubber in primary forms — Other uses (non-food)
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 151 places, 1,836 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.