Latvia vs Uruguay: Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity

Latvia
160.21 t
in 2023
Uruguay
152.84 t
in 2023
Latvia rank
61st
Uruguay rank
62nd

Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity over time

  • Latvia
  • Uruguay
01.0k2.0k3.0k201020162023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 160.21 t against 152.84 t in Uruguay, a difference of 7.37 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uruguay ahead.

Latvia ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 167 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Uruguay Difference Ahead
2010s 6.41 t 1,335 t 1,329 t Uruguay
2020s 89.47 t 213.49 t 124.02 t Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity, Latvia or Uruguay?
Latvia, at 160.21 t against 152.84 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity between Latvia and Uruguay?
7.37 t, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity?
Latvia ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
198 places, 2,478 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.