Kazakhstan vs Latvia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity

Kazakhstan
205.03 t
in 2023
Latvia
160.21 t
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
59th
Latvia rank
61st

Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Latvia
050100150200201020162023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 205.03 t against 160.21 t in Latvia, a difference of 44.82 t.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 61st of 167 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 72.1 t 6.41 t 65.69 t Kazakhstan
2020s 96.83 t 89.47 t 7.36 t Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity, Kazakhstan or Latvia?
Kazakhstan, at 205.03 t against 160.21 t in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity between Kazakhstan and Latvia?
44.82 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Latvia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Latvia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity?
Kazakhstan ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
198 places, 2,478 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.