Israel vs Latvia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity
Israel
209.21 t
in 2023
Latvia
160.21 t
in 2023
Israel rank
54th
Latvia rank
57th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 209.21 t against 160.21 t in Latvia, a difference of 49 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 57th of 152 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.05 t | 6.41 t | 42.64 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 170.16 t | 89.47 t | 80.69 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity, Israel or Latvia?
- Israel, at 209.21 t against 160.21 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity between Israel and Latvia?
- 49 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity?
- Israel ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 57th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.