Finland vs Lithuania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity

Finland
39.44 t
in 2023
Lithuania
36.84 t
in 2023
Finland rank
83rd
Lithuania rank
84th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity over time

  • Finland
  • Lithuania
020406080201020162023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 39.44 t against 36.84 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2.6 t.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lithuania ahead.

Finland ranks 83rd and Lithuania ranks 84th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 23.18 t 27.56 t 4.38 t Lithuania
2020s 30.68 t 23.41 t 7.27 t Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity, Finland or Lithuania?
Finland, at 39.44 t against 36.84 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity between Finland and Lithuania?
2.6 t, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Lithuania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Finland and Lithuania rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity?
Finland ranks 83rd and Lithuania ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
198 places, 2,478 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.