China, Macao SAR vs Solomon Islands: Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity
China, Macao SAR
0.01 t
in 2018
Solomon Islands
0.02 t
in 2018
China, Macao SAR rank
147th
Solomon Islands rank
144th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0.02 t against 0.01 t in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 0.01 t.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 2.0 times China, Macao SAR's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
China, Macao SAR ranks 147th and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 152 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity, China, Macao SAR or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 0.02 t against 0.01 t in China, Macao SAR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity between China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands?
- 0.01 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — import quantity?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 147th and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.