China vs Middle Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value

China
3.10 million 1000 USD
in 2024
Middle Africa
113,574 1000 USD
in 2024
China rank
2nd
Middle Africa rank
4th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value over time

  • China
  • Middle Africa
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922024

How they compare

China currently reports 3.10 million 1000 USD against 113,574 1000 USD in Middle Africa, a difference of 2.99 million 1000 USD.

That makes China's figure about 27.3 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

China ranks 2nd and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 19 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 53,177 1000 USD 22,456 1000 USD 30,721 1000 USD China
1970s 246,930 1000 USD 32,067 1000 USD 214,862 1000 USD China
1980s 661,985 1000 USD 44,831 1000 USD 617,154 1000 USD China
1990s 1.34 million 1000 USD 101,722 1000 USD 1.24 million 1000 USD China
2000s 1.92 million 1000 USD 109,197 1000 USD 1.81 million 1000 USD China
2010s 2.85 million 1000 USD 107,394 1000 USD 2.74 million 1000 USD China
2020s 3.06 million 1000 USD 103,864 1000 USD 2.96 million 1000 USD China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value, China or Middle Africa?
China, at 3.10 million 1000 USD against 113,574 1000 USD in Middle Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value between China and Middle Africa?
2.99 million 1000 USD, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Middle Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Middle Africa rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
China ranks 2nd and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 19 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Middle Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/china/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/china/middle-africa/">China vs Middle Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
39 places, 2,297 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.