China vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value

China
3.10 million 1000 USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1,620 1000 USD
in 2024
China rank
2nd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
13th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value over time

  • China
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922024

How they compare

China currently reports 3.10 million 1000 USD against 1,620 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 3.10 million 1000 USD.

That makes China's figure about 1,914.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 64 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 19 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 53,177 1000 USD 1,853 1000 USD 51,324 1000 USD China
1970s 246,930 1000 USD 2,864 1000 USD 244,065 1000 USD China
1980s 661,985 1000 USD 4,503 1000 USD 657,482 1000 USD China
1990s 1.34 million 1000 USD 8,226 1000 USD 1.34 million 1000 USD China
2000s 1.92 million 1000 USD 10,163 1000 USD 1.91 million 1000 USD China
2010s 2.85 million 1000 USD 8,002 1000 USD 2.84 million 1000 USD China
2020s 3.06 million 1000 USD 2,354 1000 USD 3.06 million 1000 USD China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value, China or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
China, at 3.10 million 1000 USD against 1,620 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value between China and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
3.10 million 1000 USD, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
China ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 19 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/china/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/china/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">China vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
39 places, 2,297 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.