China vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value
Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value over time
- China
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
How they compare
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 4.01 million 1000 Int$ against 1.10 million 1000 Int$ in China, a difference of 2.91 million 1000 Int$.
That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 3.6 times China's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
China ranks 3rd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,909 1000 Int$ | 348,942 1000 Int$ | 330,033 1000 Int$ | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1970s | 87,806 1000 Int$ | 388,412 1000 Int$ | 300,607 1000 Int$ | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1980s | 235,395 1000 Int$ | 396,036 1000 Int$ | 160,641 1000 Int$ | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1990s | 477,714 1000 Int$ | 390,418 1000 Int$ | 87,296 1000 Int$ | China |
| 2000s | 682,852 1000 Int$ | 622,826 1000 Int$ | 60,025 1000 Int$ | China |
| 2010s | 1.01 million 1000 Int$ | 1.33 million 1000 Int$ | 314,848 1000 Int$ | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.09 million 1000 Int$ | 3.30 million 1000 Int$ | 2.21 million 1000 Int$ | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value, China or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 4.01 million 1000 Int$ against 1.10 million 1000 Int$ in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value between China and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 2.91 million 1000 Int$, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do China and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — gross production value?
- China ranks 3rd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.