Iceland vs Libya: Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation
Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Libya
0 t
in 2023
Iceland rank
6th
Libya rank
6th
Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation over time
- Iceland
- Libya
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 6th and Libya ranks 6th of 143 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1883 t | -1.67 t | 1.85 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0925 t | 0 t | 0.0925 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms — stock variation, Iceland or Libya?
- Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms — stock variation between Iceland and Libya?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Libya?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Libya rank globally for natural rubber in other forms — stock variation?
- Iceland ranks 6th and Libya ranks 6th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.