Finland vs French Polynesia: Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation
Finland
0 t
in 2023
French Polynesia
2.15 t
in 2023
Finland rank
6th
French Polynesia rank
3rd
Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation over time
- Finland
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 2.15 t against 0 t in Finland, a difference of 2.15 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Finland ranks 6th and French Polynesia ranks 3rd of 143 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.0025 t | 0.5375 t | 0.535 t | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms — stock variation, Finland or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 2.15 t against 0 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms — stock variation between Finland and French Polynesia?
- 2.15 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and French Polynesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Finland and French Polynesia rank globally for natural rubber in other forms — stock variation?
- Finland ranks 6th and French Polynesia ranks 3rd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.