Iceland vs Namibia: Natural rubber in other forms β Residuals
Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Iceland rank
5th
Namibia rank
5th
Natural rubber in other forms β Residuals over time
- Iceland
- Namibia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Iceland ranks 5th and Namibia ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.8 t | 0 t | 0.8 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 t | -6 t | 6 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms β residuals, Iceland or Namibia?
- Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms β residuals between Iceland and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for natural rubber in other forms β residuals?
- Iceland ranks 5th and Namibia ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms β Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.