China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sierra Leone: Natural rubber in other forms — Residuals
China, Hong Kong SAR
-9 t
in 2023
Sierra Leone
-4 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
147th
Sierra Leone rank
145th
Natural rubber in other forms — Residuals over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports -4 t against -9 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 5 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 147th and Sierra Leone ranks 145th of 156 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -19.25 t | -4.75 t | 14.5 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | -4.5 t | -1 t | 3.5 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms — residuals, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at -4 t against -9 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms — residuals between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sierra Leone?
- 5 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sierra Leone?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sierra Leone rank globally for natural rubber in other forms — residuals?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 147th and Sierra Leone ranks 145th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.