Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in other forms — Other uses
Namibia
3.3 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7.96 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
106th
Natural rubber in other forms — Other uses over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 7.96 t against 3.3 t in Namibia, a difference of 4.66 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 131 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5,742 t | 550.98 t | 5,191 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.94 t | 85.88 t | 83.94 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms — other uses, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 7.96 t against 3.3 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms — other uses between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 4.66 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in other forms — other uses?
- Namibia ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.