China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Natural rubber in other forms — Import quantity
China, Hong Kong SAR
56.24 t
in 2023
Latvia
57.91 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
83rd
Latvia rank
82nd
Natural rubber in other forms — Import quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 57.91 t against 56.24 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1.67 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 82nd of 152 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,771 t | 77.5 t | 2,693 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 824.11 t | 54.6 t | 769.51 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in other forms — import quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 57.91 t against 56.24 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in other forms — import quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 1.67 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for natural rubber in other forms — import quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 83rd and Latvia ranks 82nd of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in other forms — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.