Latvia vs Lebanon: Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lebanon
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
47th
Lebanon rank
49th
Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Lebanon, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 47th and Lebanon ranks 49th of 118 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural honey — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Lebanon?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in natural honey — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Lebanon?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lebanon?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Lebanon rank globally for natural honey — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 47th and Lebanon ranks 49th of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural honey — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.