Denmark vs Papua New Guinea: Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
106th
Papua New Guinea rank
104th
Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 104th of 118 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural honey — production, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in natural honey — production, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Papua New Guinea rank globally for natural honey — production, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 104th of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural honey — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.