South Africa vs Zambia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

South Africa
0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
106th
Zambia rank
103rd

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • South Africa
  • Zambia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Zambia ahead.

South Africa ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 103rd of 117 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), South Africa or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between South Africa and Zambia?
0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zambia?
39 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zambia rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
South Africa ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 103rd of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zambia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zambia/">South Africa vs Zambia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.