Fiji vs Tunisia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Fiji
0.0958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
56th
Tunisia rank
59th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Fiji
  • Tunisia
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.0958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Fiji ranks 56th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 117 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0465 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0713 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Fiji or Tunisia?
Fiji, at 0.0958 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Fiji and Tunisia?
0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Tunisia rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Fiji ranks 56th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Tunisia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/fiji/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/fiji/tunisia/">Fiji vs Tunisia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.