Cyprus vs New Zealand: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cyprus
0.2008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
New Zealand
0.1641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
33rd
New Zealand rank
36th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cyprus
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.2008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Cyprus ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 36th of 117 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0706 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.1061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0826 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 0.1904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0876 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 0.2226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 0.2692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 0.1623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cyprus or New Zealand?
Cyprus, at 0.2008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cyprus and New Zealand?
0.0367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and New Zealand?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cyprus and New Zealand rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cyprus ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 36th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs New Zealand: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/new-zealand/">Cyprus vs New Zealand: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.