Cuba vs Uruguay: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cuba
0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.2153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
27th
Uruguay rank
30th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cuba
  • Uruguay
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.3024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0804 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.2019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.2018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.2579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.2966 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cuba or Uruguay?
Cuba, at 0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cuba and Uruguay?
0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Uruguay rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cuba ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Uruguay: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uruguay/">Cuba vs Uruguay: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.