Cuba vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cuba
0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
27th
Jamaica rank
24th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cuba
  • Jamaica
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Cuba ranks 27th and Jamaica ranks 24th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3709 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.3024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3325 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.2019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2585 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0566 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.2018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.2579 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.2966 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cuba or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cuba and Jamaica?
0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cuba ranks 27th and Jamaica ranks 24th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/jamaica/">Cuba vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.