Chad vs Mozambique: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
108th
Mozambique rank
109th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Mozambique
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 117 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Mozambique?
Chad, at 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Mozambique?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mozambique?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mozambique rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 108th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mozambique: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mozambique/">Chad vs Mozambique: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.