Chad vs Mali: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
108th
Mali rank
110th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Mali
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 108th and Mali ranks 110th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Mali?
Chad, at 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Mali?
0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mali?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mali rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 108th and Mali ranks 110th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mali: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/mali/">Chad vs Mali: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.