Central African Republic vs Latvia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Central African Republic
0.0974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Central African Republic rank
54th
Latvia rank
57th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Latvia
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 57th of 117 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0.0786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0352 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0.0919 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Central African Republic or Latvia?
Central African Republic, at 0.0974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Central African Republic and Latvia?
0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Central African Republic ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 57th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Latvia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/latvia/">Central African Republic vs Latvia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.