Canada vs Norway: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Canada
0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
86th
Norway rank
89th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Canada
  • Norway
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Canada ranks 86th and Norway ranks 89th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Canada or Norway?
Canada, at 0.0178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Canada and Norway?
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Norway rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Canada ranks 86th and Norway ranks 89th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Norway: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/norway/">Canada vs Norway: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.