Cameroon vs Sweden: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cameroon
0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Cameroon rank
75th
Sweden rank
76th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Sweden
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Cameroon ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 76th of 117 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cameroon or Sweden?
Cameroon, at 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cameroon and Sweden?
0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cameroon and Sweden rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cameroon ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 76th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Sweden: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/sweden/">Cameroon vs Sweden: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.