Brazil vs Japan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Brazil
0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
77th
Japan rank
78th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Brazil
  • Japan
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Brazil ranks 77th and Japan ranks 78th of 117 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0736 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0698 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.0253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Brazil or Japan?
Brazil, at 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Brazil and Japan?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Japan rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Brazil ranks 77th and Japan ranks 78th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Japan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/japan/">Brazil vs Japan: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.