Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
21st
Jamaica rank
24th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Jamaica
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jamaica ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 21st and Jamaica ranks 24th of 117 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Jamaica Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.1453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.2384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.2385 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jamaica?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaica?
0.0463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaica?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaica rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 21st and Jamaica ranks 24th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/jamaica/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jamaica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.