Australia vs French Polynesia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia
0.0015 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
French Polynesia
0.0016 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Australia rank
43rd
French Polynesia rank
40th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Australia
  • French Polynesia
00.0020.0040.006196119922024

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 43rd and French Polynesia ranks 40th of 117 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0056 1000 Int$ per person Australia
1970s 0.0052 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.005 1000 Int$ per person Australia
1980s 0.0056 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person Australia
1990s 0.0045 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0038 1000 Int$ per person Australia
2000s 0.0032 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person Australia
2010s 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person Australia
2020s 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and French Polynesia?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per person, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and French Polynesia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and French Polynesia rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 43rd and French Polynesia ranks 40th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs French Polynesia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/australia/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/australia/french-polynesia/">Australia vs French Polynesia: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 6,024 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.