Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Molluscs, Other — Food supply
Molluscs, Other — Food supply over time
- Tonga
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 4.69 million Kcal against 4.66 million Kcal in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.03 million Kcal.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Tonga ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 161 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.69 million Kcal | 2.16 million Kcal | 2.53 million Kcal | Tonga |
| 2020s | 4.69 million Kcal | 4.05 million Kcal | 0.6425 million Kcal | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher molluscs, other — food supply, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
- Tonga, at 4.69 million Kcal against 4.66 million Kcal in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in molluscs, other — food supply between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 0.03 million Kcal, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for molluscs, other — food supply?
- Tonga ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Molluscs, Other — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.