Israel vs Latvia: Molasses — Production, per square kilometre
Israel
0 t per square kilometre
in 2018
Latvia
0 t per square kilometre
in 2018
Israel rank
111th
Latvia rank
111th
Molasses — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 123 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.2511 t per square kilometre | 0.2511 t per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.2298 t per square kilometre | 0.2298 t per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher molasses — production, per square kilometre, Israel or Latvia?
- Israel, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in molasses — production, per square kilometre between Israel and Latvia?
- 0 t per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for molasses — production, per square kilometre?
- Israel ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Molasses — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Molasses — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.