Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Molasses — Production, per capita
Croatia
0.0073 t per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0072 t per person
in 2023
Croatia rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
42nd
Molasses — Production, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.0073 t per person against 0.0072 t per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 123 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0087 t per person | 0.0097 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0127 t per person | 0.0106 t per person | 0.0021 t per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.0147 t per person | 0.0091 t per person | 0.0056 t per person | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.0096 t per person | 0.0078 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher molasses — production, per capita, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
- Croatia, at 0.0073 t per person against 0.0072 t per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in molasses — production, per capita between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for molasses — production, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Molasses — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Molasses — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.