China, Hong Kong SAR vs Marshall Islands: Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value

China, Hong Kong SAR
6.6 g/cap/d
in 2023
Marshall Islands
6.6 g/cap/d
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
5th
Marshall Islands rank
5th

Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Marshall Islands
02468201020162023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6.6 g/cap/d against 6.6 g/cap/d in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0 g/cap/d.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 5th and Marshall Islands ranks 5th of 154 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 3.8 g/cap/d 6.4 g/cap/d 2.6 g/cap/d Marshall Islands
2020s 5.97 g/cap/d 7.45 g/cap/d 1.48 g/cap/d Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher miscellaneous — protein supply — value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Marshall Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6.6 g/cap/d against 6.6 g/cap/d in Marshall Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in miscellaneous — protein supply — value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Marshall Islands?
0 g/cap/d, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Marshall Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Marshall Islands rank globally for miscellaneous — protein supply — value?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 5th and Marshall Islands ranks 5th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Marshall Islands: Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/miscellaneous-protein-supply-value/china-hong-kong-sar/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/miscellaneous-protein-supply-value/china-hong-kong-sar/marshall-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Marshall Islands: Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Miscellaneous — Protein supply — Value
Unit
g/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,234 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.