Australia vs Georgia: Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value

Australia
91 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Georgia
100 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Australia rank
36th
Georgia rank
34th

Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value over time

  • Australia
  • Georgia
050100150201020162023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 100 mg/cap/d against 91 mg/cap/d in Australia, a difference of 9 mg/cap/d.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 34th of 166 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 105.4 mg/cap/d 71.8 mg/cap/d 33.6 mg/cap/d Australia
2020s 123.25 mg/cap/d 96 mg/cap/d 27.25 mg/cap/d Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher miscellaneous — calcium supply — value, Australia or Georgia?
Georgia, at 100 mg/cap/d against 91 mg/cap/d in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in miscellaneous — calcium supply — value between Australia and Georgia?
9 mg/cap/d, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Georgia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and Georgia rank globally for miscellaneous — calcium supply — value?
Australia ranks 36th and Georgia ranks 34th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Georgia: Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/miscellaneous-calcium-supply-value/australia/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/miscellaneous-calcium-supply-value/australia/georgia/">Australia vs Georgia: Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Miscellaneous — Calcium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,234 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.