Jordan vs Suriname: Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value
Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value over time
- Jordan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1,848 kcal/cap/d against 1,839 kcal/cap/d in Jordan, a difference of 9 kcal/cap/d.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 96th and Suriname ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,772 kcal/cap/d | 1,813 kcal/cap/d | 40.6 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,803 kcal/cap/d | 1,832 kcal/cap/d | 29 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,831 kcal/cap/d | 1,846 kcal/cap/d | 15.17 kcal/cap/d | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value, Jordan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1,848 kcal/cap/d against 1,839 kcal/cap/d in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value between Jordan and Suriname?
- 9 kcal/cap/d, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Suriname rank globally for minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — value?
- Jordan ranks 96th and Suriname ranks 94th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Minimum dietary energy requirement (kcal/cap/day) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.