Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Millet — Gross Production Value

Australia and New Zealand
15,999 1000 USD
in 2024
Southern Africa
4,598 1000 USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
23rd
Southern Africa rank
22nd

Millet — Gross Production Value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Southern Africa
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 15,999 1000 USD against 4,598 1000 USD in Southern Africa, a difference of 11,401 1000 USD.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3.5 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and Southern Africa ranks 22nd of 61 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Southern Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 11,616 1000 USD 7,941 1000 USD 3,676 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand
1970s 13,706 1000 USD 11,258 1000 USD 2,448 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand
1980s 13,928 1000 USD 14,574 1000 USD 645.8 1000 USD Southern Africa
1990s 14,428 1000 USD 16,927 1000 USD 2,500 1000 USD Southern Africa
2000s 15,539 1000 USD 18,460 1000 USD 2,921 1000 USD Southern Africa
2010s 15,781 1000 USD 13,106 1000 USD 2,675 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand
2020s 16,013 1000 USD 14,158 1000 USD 1,854 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher millet — gross production value, Australia and New Zealand or Southern Africa?
Australia and New Zealand, at 15,999 1000 USD against 4,598 1000 USD in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in millet — gross production value between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa?
11,401 1000 USD, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa rank globally for millet — gross production value?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 23rd and Southern Africa ranks 22nd of 61 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Millet — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Millet — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/millet-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/millet-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Millet — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Millet — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
95 places, 5,125 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.