Australia vs Luxembourg: Milk, Total — Production, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
104th
Luxembourg rank
101st
Milk, Total — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 163 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher milk, total — production, per unit of gdp, Australia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in milk, total — production, per unit of gdp between Australia and Luxembourg?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Luxembourg rank globally for milk, total — production, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Milk, Total — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Milk, Total — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.